PV Bulletin

Best practice in the labelling and packaging of medicines

The MHRA has updated its best practice guidance regarding medicines labelling and packaging to enhance safety and reduce medication errors.

PV Impact Brief

Urgency: HighConfidence: high

What changed

MAHs must ensure that product labelling and packaging conform to the updated best practices, which may involve modifications to existing labelling SOPs and review processes.

Why it matters

Improved labelling and packaging practices are essential for the safe use of medicines and can significantly reduce the risk of medication errors that affect patient safety.

Action needed

MAHs must update labelling components to meet new criteria, including a minimum font size of 7 points and essential information requirements regarding the medicine's name, strength, route of administration, posology, warnings, and indications as per the guidance. New packaging must be incorporated into stocked products within six months of approval.

Relevant for
Regulatory Intelligence LeadLabeling LeadQPPV
Processes impacted
Labeling
Owner

Regulatory Intelligence Lead

Review cadence

Quarterly reviews recommended to ensure ongoing compliance with labelling updates.

Policy change details

Document type
Guideline
Policy status
final
Publication date
2026-07-03
Last updated
2026-07-03
Policy change
The MHRA has updated its best practice guidance on the labelling and packaging of medicines to ensure that safety information is presented clearly and effectively to minimize medication errors and improve patient safety.

Key changes

Updated recommendations for the design, layout, and content of medicines labelling and packaging, with a focus on risk minimisation and the clarity of safety warnings.

Affected workflows

Labeling

Responsible groups

Regulatory AffairsPharmacovigilanceQuality AssuranceMedical Affairs

Document identifiers

Best practice guidance on the labelling and packaging of medicines

PV impact

Marketing Authorization Holders (MAHs) must ensure that product labelling and packaging align with these updated best practices to support risk management and safety communications. This may require updates to existing labelling SOPs and artwork review processes.

View regulator source

Source document details

Exact policy details

Font Size Requirement
7 points minimum (lower case 'x' must be at least 1.4 mm in height)
Applies to: All labelling components for all medicines
Section 4.1 · p. 6 · High · Source
Critical Information Requirements
Must include name of the medicine, expression of strength, route of administration, posology, warnings, and indications (for OTC only)
Applies to: All labelling components for all medicines
Section 4.2 · p. 7 · High · Source
Approval and Introduction of New Packaging
New packaging components must be introduced into packed stock within six months of approval
Applies to: Marketing Authorisation Holders (MAHs)
Section 3 · p. 3 · High · Source
User Testing Recommendation
User testing is recognized as best practice but is not legally required
Applies to: Pharmaceutical industry during major layout changes
Section 4.8 · p. 10 · High · Source

Workflow rule impacts

LabelingMarketing Authorization Holders (MAHs)

Pharmaceutical companies may need to budget and allocate resources for user testing

Guidance on user testing may alter the submission process for changes to labeling

Section 4.8 · p. 10 · High · Source

Evidence and confidence

Confidence: highSource updated: Jul 3, 2026

Full briefing

Practical implication

MAHs must update labelling components to meet new criteria, including a minimum font size of 7 points and essential information requirements regarding the medicine's name, strength, route of administration, posology, warnings, and indications as per the guidance. New packaging must be incorporated into stocked products within six months of approval.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has updated its guidance on labelling and packaging, requiring Marketing Authorization Holders (MAHs) to align their product labelling with new recommendations. These adjustments aim to improve clarity and risk management to minimize medication errors.

What changed: MAHs must ensure that product labelling and packaging conform to the updated best practices, which may involve modifications to existing labelling SOPs and review processes.

Why it matters: Improved labelling and packaging practices are essential for the safe use of medicines and can significantly reduce the risk of medication errors that affect patient safety.

Practical implication: MAHs must update labelling components to meet new criteria, including a minimum font size of 7 points and essential information requirements regarding the medicine's name, strength, route of administration, posology, warnings, and indications as per the guidance. New packaging must be incorporated into stocked products within six months of approval.

View original source

Published from the Firecrawl policy change extraction pipeline.

Related updates for your role

publicFDA · United States · Updated Aug 17, 2026

Revised FDA Guidance on ANDA and 505(b)(2) Application Submission

Urgency: High

Implement a gap analysis for 505(b)(2) applications to identify safety data needs and adjust safety monitoring systems as necessary to accommodate new product characteristics.

Country ComplianceRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact1 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Draft Guidance
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicMedicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) · United Kingdom · Updated Aug 18, 2026

UK Position Paper on Microbiome-Based Medicinal Products (MBMPs)

Urgency: High

MAHs and sponsors must enhance their pharmacovigilance systems to monitor microbiome-specific safety issues, comply with established safety standards, and address concerns related to antimicrobial resistance.

Signal ManagementCountry ComplianceRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact2 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, Signal Management Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Position Paper
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicU.S. Food and Drug Administration · United States · Updated Aug 18, 2026

Regulatory Framework for Generative AI-Enabled Medical Devices

Urgency: High

Stakeholders, including manufacturers and clinicians, must review and potentially revise their post-market vigilance and safety monitoring protocols in response to the FDA's proposed regulatory approaches for generative AI devices.

Signal ManagementICSRRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact2 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, Signal Management Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Notice
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicMHRA · United Kingdom · Updated Aug 18, 2026

MHRA Clarifies Regulatory Pathways for Microbiome-Based Medicinal Products

Urgency: High

Developers of MBMPs must align their safety assessment protocols with the MHRA's expectations and are encouraged to engage with the MHRA early to establish appropriate regulatory strategies.

Literature SurveillanceCountry ComplianceRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact2 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Notice / Position Paper
Read impact briefarrow_forward