PV Bulletin

Introduction of Mandatory Annual Safety Report (ASR) Module in CTIS

The EMA announces a new ASR module in the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS), becoming the mandatory channel for ASR submissions for clinical trials under Regulation (EU) No 536/2014.

Primary source: Download medicine data | European Medicines Agency (EMA)

PV Impact Brief

Urgency: HighConfidence: high

What changed

The ASR module in the CTIS becomes mandatory for submitting Annual Safety Reports for clinical trials, requiring compliance with new submission protocols established under Regulation (EU) No 536/2014.

Why it matters

This change impacts clinical trial sponsors as they are required to adapt their safety reporting workflows to ensure compliance with the new mandatory channel for ASR submissions.

Action needed

Clinical trial sponsors must update internal standard operating procedures (SOPs), conduct staff training on the functionality of the new ASR module, and utilize the CTIS training environment to ensure readiness for compliance with the new workflow.

Relevant for
Regulatory Intelligence LeadQPPV
Processes impacted
ICSRCountry Compliance
Owner

Regulatory Intelligence Lead

Review cadence

Review in the next regulatory intelligence cycle.

Policy change details

Document type
Notice
Policy status
new
Publication date
12 June 2026
Policy change
Announcement and technical overview of a new Annual Safety Report (ASR) module within the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS). This module will become the mandatory channel for submitting and managing ASRs (equivalent to Development Safety Update Reports/DSURs) for clinical trials conducted under the Clinical Trials Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 536/2014).

Key changes

Introduction of a dedicated ASR safety module in CTIS; transition to a mandatory submission channel for ASRs; updated functionalities for managing safety reporting in the system; new process for accessing the CTIS training environment.

Affected workflows

ICSRCountry Compliance

Responsible groups

SponsorsPV OperationsClinical SafetyRegulatory Affairs

PV impact

Clinical trial sponsors must prepare for the mandatory transition to the CTIS ASR module for safety report submissions. PV operations and clinical safety teams will need to update internal SOPs, train staff on the new module's functionalities, and use the CTIS training environment to ensure compliance with the new submission workflow.

View regulator source

Source document details

Evidence and confidence

Confidence: highSource updated: Jun 12, 2026

Full briefing

Practical implication

Clinical trial sponsors must update internal standard operating procedures (SOPs), conduct staff training on the functionality of the new ASR module, and utilize the CTIS training environment to ensure readiness for compliance with the new workflow.

The new ASR module will be the required method for submitting and managing Annual Safety Reports, analogous to Development Safety Update Reports (DSURs). This transition necessitates that clinical trial sponsors prepare by updating internal procedures and training staff on the new system functionalities.

What changed: The ASR module in the CTIS becomes mandatory for submitting Annual Safety Reports for clinical trials, requiring compliance with new submission protocols established under Regulation (EU) No 536/2014.

Why it matters: This change impacts clinical trial sponsors as they are required to adapt their safety reporting workflows to ensure compliance with the new mandatory channel for ASR submissions.

Practical implication: Clinical trial sponsors must update internal standard operating procedures (SOPs), conduct staff training on the functionality of the new ASR module, and utilize the CTIS training environment to ensure readiness for compliance with the new workflow.

View original source

Published from the Firecrawl policy change extraction pipeline.

Related updates for your role

publicFDA · United States · Updated Aug 17, 2026

Revised FDA Guidance on ANDA and 505(b)(2) Application Submission

Urgency: High

Implement a gap analysis for 505(b)(2) applications to identify safety data needs and adjust safety monitoring systems as necessary to accommodate new product characteristics.

Country ComplianceRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact1 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Draft Guidance
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicMedicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) · United Kingdom · Updated Aug 18, 2026

UK Position Paper on Microbiome-Based Medicinal Products (MBMPs)

Urgency: High

MAHs and sponsors must enhance their pharmacovigilance systems to monitor microbiome-specific safety issues, comply with established safety standards, and address concerns related to antimicrobial resistance.

Signal ManagementCountry ComplianceRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact2 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, Signal Management Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Position Paper
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicU.S. Food and Drug Administration · United States · Updated Aug 18, 2026

Regulatory Framework for Generative AI-Enabled Medical Devices

Urgency: High

Stakeholders, including manufacturers and clinicians, must review and potentially revise their post-market vigilance and safety monitoring protocols in response to the FDA's proposed regulatory approaches for generative AI devices.

Signal ManagementICSRRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact2 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, Signal Management Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Notice
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicMHRA · United Kingdom · Updated Aug 18, 2026

MHRA Clarifies Regulatory Pathways for Microbiome-Based Medicinal Products

Urgency: High

Developers of MBMPs must align their safety assessment protocols with the MHRA's expectations and are encouraged to engage with the MHRA early to establish appropriate regulatory strategies.

Literature SurveillanceCountry ComplianceRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact2 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Notice / Position Paper
Read impact briefarrow_forward