PV Bulletin
MhraUnited Kingdom

MHRA hub consolidates GB medical device PMS, MORE reporting and PSUR

MHRA’s GB device PMS collection consolidates guidance on vigilance reporting, MORE submissions and PSUR resources aligned to the 2024 PMS Regulations (in force 16 June 2025).

Primary source: GOV.UK (MHRA) publication: Documentation for implementation of data requirements under the new post-marketing surveillance regulations

PV Impact Brief

Urgency: HighConfidence: medium

What changed

MHRA has consolidated and continues maintaining a GOV.UK collection hub for GB medical device PMS and vigilance. The collection links manufacturer-facing guidance on PMS requirements (including summary tables and a table of key changes), supplementary vigilance system guidance (including examples of reportable incidents and field safety notice guidance), MORE reporting guidance, and device PSUR resources (including a standardised PSUR format and PSUR guidance tied to the Medical Devices (Post-market Surveillance Requirements) (Amendment) (Great Britain) Regulations 2024). MHRA guidance pages state these Regulations came into force on 16 June 2025.

Why it matters

This MHRA hub concentrates the operational materials that support compliance with Great Britain’s device PMS and vigilance framework, including incident and FSCA notification expectations and the reporting route via MORE. For PV/medical device vigilance functions, treating the collection as the authoritative index supports inspection readiness (evidence that procedures reference current MHRA materials), reduces risk of using outdated reporting pathways or templates, and helps ensure aggregate device safety documentation (PSUR format/guidance) is aligned to the Regulations 2024 framework that MHRA guidance states has been in force since 16 June 2025.

Action needed

Safety/Device Vigilance owner to: (1) confirm SOPs and training link to MHRA’s “Medical devices: post-market surveillance” collection as the live index; (2) validate operational readiness to submit adverse incident and FSCA-related reports via MHRA’s referenced MORE route; (3) confirm device PSUR process uses MHRA-linked standardised PSUR format and PSUR guidance tied to the Regulations 2024 framework; (4) update internal regulatory intelligence trackers with the 16 June 2025 in-force date cited across MHRA guidance, and monitor related MHRA future regime pages for further updates.

Relevant for
Local Safety OfficerRegulatory Intelligence LeadPV Operations LeadMedical Device Vigilance LeadPV Quality LeadAggregate Reports LeadQPPV
Processes impacted
Local Affiliate ComplianceDevice VigilanceInspection ReadinessICSR SubmissionAggregate ReportingRegulatory Intelligence Monitoring
Owner

Medical Device Vigilance Lead (with PV Quality Lead and Regulatory Intelligence Lead)

Review cadence

Gap-check within 30 days; then monitor the MHRA collection and related guidance pages quarterly for maintenance updates.

Evidence and confidence

Confidence: mediumSource update date not verified — confirm on the regulator site before acting

Primary-source confirmation recommended before operational implementation.

Full briefing

Practical implication

Safety/Device Vigilance owner to: (1) confirm SOPs and training link to MHRA’s “Medical devices: post-market surveillance” collection as the live index; (2) validate operational readiness to submit adverse incident and FSCA-related reports via MHRA’s referenced MORE route; (3) confirm device PSUR process uses MHRA-linked standardised PSUR format and PSUR guidance tied to the Regulations 2024 framework; (4) update internal regulatory intelligence trackers with the 16 June 2025 in-force date cited across MHRA guidance, and monitor related MHRA future regime pages for further updates.

MHRA’s GOV.UK collection page “Medical devices: post-market surveillance” functions as a consolidated compliance hub for manufacturers operating in Great Britain (GB). For pharmacovigilance and medical device vigilance teams, the practical change is not a single new form or template in isolation, but the regulator’s maintenance of a single index that signposts the core materials needed to run a compliant PMS system, route vigilance submissions, and prepare device periodic safety update reports (PSURs) under the Great Britain framework.

The collection is explicitly positioned for manufacturers and covers post-market surveillance (PMS), reporting adverse incidents, and reporting field safety corrective actions (FSCA) to MHRA. MHRA lists the collection as published on 26 January 2015 and last updated on 5 September 2025, indicating ongoing maintenance. Related MHRA guidance pages that the collection cross-links to have also been updated into 2026, reinforcing that teams should treat these pages as living guidance rather than static reference documents.

From an operational perspective, the collection signposts several distinct but interdependent workstreams that typically sit across PV operations, device vigilance, quality systems and regulatory intelligence. First, it links to MHRA guidance on the post-market surveillance requirements, including summary materials and a “table of key changes.” Second, it links supplementary guidance for the manufacturer vigilance system, including examples of reportable incidents and guidance relevant to field safety notices. Third, it includes guidance on the Manufacturers Online Reporting Environment (MORE), the MHRA submission route referenced for reporting. Fourth, it links to PSUR resources for devices, including a standardised PSUR format and PSUR guidance tied to the Medical Devices (Post-market Surveillance Requirements) (Amendment) (Great Britain) Regulations 2024.

MHRA guidance states that the Medical Devices (Post-market Surveillance requirements) (Amendment) (Great Britain) Regulations 2024 came into force on 16 June 2025. MHRA’s “Medical devices: post-market surveillance requirements” guidance explains that these Regulations amend the UK Medical Devices Regulations 2002 by inserting a new Part 4A on PMS requirements for medical devices applying within Great Britain, including notification requirements for incidents and preventive and corrective actions. Other MHRA guidance pages referenced in the fact set similarly state the in-force date and frame the Regulations as supporting greater traceability of incidents and trends to enable MHRA to act swiftly to address safety issues.

For PV and vigilance teams, the key exposure is any organisation responsible for GB device vigilance reporting (adverse incidents and FSCA/field safety notice communications), any function relying on MORE as a submission route, and teams preparing device PSURs using MHRA-linked formats and guidance. This includes manufacturers placing medical devices on the GB market, including in vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices and active implantable medical devices, as explicitly referenced in MHRA guidance describing the scope of the PMS requirements in Great Britain.

Because this is a country compliance guide and consolidation/maintenance story, the immediate PV value is in governance: ensuring internal controlled documents point to the correct “live” regulator index and that operational staff follow the regulator’s current signposting for submissions and periodic documentation. In practice, that means vigilance procedures and training materials should reference the collection page as the authoritative route to MHRA materials for PMS systems, incident/FSCA notifications, and device PSUR resources. The same applies to inspection readiness: where organisations demonstrate that they monitor regulator guidance and keep procedures aligned, it can be helpful that a single MHRA hub is maintained and clearly scoped to the workflows that inspectors will commonly interrogate (PMS system, incident handling, corrective actions and periodic reporting).

PV Bulletin notes one minor documentation nuance highlighted in the fact set: an excerpt from the collection page truncates the in-force date (“16 J”), while other MHRA guidance pages state the date as 16 June 2025. Operationally, this reinforces the need for regulatory intelligence and quality owners to validate key compliance dates across the linked MHRA guidance pages and ensure internal trackers and training materials reflect the in-force date cited across MHRA guidance.

Next steps for teams mapped to GB device vigilance are therefore procedural and system-focused. Medical Device Vigilance Leads, supported by PV Quality and Regulatory Intelligence, should confirm that SOPs, work instructions and training link to MHRA’s “Medical devices: post-market surveillance” collection as the live index; validate operational readiness to submit adverse incident and FSCA-related reports using the MHRA-referenced MORE route; and confirm the device PSUR process uses the MHRA-linked standardised PSUR format and associated PSUR guidance tied to the Regulations 2024 framework. Given the evidence of ongoing maintenance updates, teams should also establish a quarterly monitoring cadence for the collection and related MHRA guidance pages.

Practical implication: if your GB device vigilance workflows, MORE submission steps, or PSUR templates are not explicitly aligned to the MHRA collection and the Regulations 2024 framework (in force 16 June 2025 per MHRA guidance), prioritise a documented gap-check and controlled document update, then monitor MHRA’s hub quarterly for maintenance changes relevant to case processing, CAPA linkage and inspection readiness.

Related updates for your role

publicEuropean Medicines Agency · EU · Updated Jul 15, 2026

Reflection paper on particulars for safety signals for (traditional) herbal medicinal products

Urgency: High

Implement increased documentation and reporting processes for traditional herbal medicinal products. Ensure staff receive training on the complexities involved in signal management for these products.

Signal ManagementRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact1 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, Signal Management Lead
verifiedRegulatory action: Draft Guidance
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicCenter for Drug Evaluation (CDE), National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) · China · Updated Jul 14, 2026

Technical Guidelines for Communication on Real-World Evidence Supporting the Extension of Pediatric Indications for Marketed Drugs (Draft for Comments)

Urgency: High

Sponsors must implement early communication strategies with the CDE regarding RWE study plans as a prerequisite for pediatric indication extension submissions.

Country ComplianceRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact1 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Consultation
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicEuropean Medicines Agency · EU · Updated Jul 15, 2026

Updated eCTD v4.0 technical validation criteria

Urgency: High

All electronic PV submissions must undergo new validation checks in accordance with the updated criteria to ensure compliance and accuracy.

Country ComplianceICSRRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact2 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Technical Guidance
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicHealth Canada · Canada · Updated Jul 15, 2026

Order Providing for Reliance on Foreign Regulatory Authority Decisions for Certain Drugs (Ministerial Reliance Order)

Urgency: High

Manufacturers must demonstrate that any variances from the foreign authorized drugs do not adversely affect safety or effectiveness when filing for deeming under this new framework.

Country ComplianceSignal ManagementRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact2 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead, Signal Management Lead, QPPV
verifiedRegulatory action: Draft Guidance
Read impact briefarrow_forward