PV Bulletin

Post-authorisation safety studies (PASS): Update on Assessment Timelines and Submission Requirements

EMA clarifies the submission timelines and protocol requirements for non-interventional imposed PASS, focusing on draft protocols and the assessment process.

PV Impact Brief

Urgency: HighConfidence: high

What changed

EMA established that draft protocols for non-interventional imposed PASS should now be submitted in Module 1.8.2 and aligned submission timelines for assessments are defined as 74 days for PRAC review and 67 days for EC decision.

Why it matters

MAHs need to adjust their planning and submission processes to comply with these updated timelines and requirements, which could significantly impact the speed of study implementation and monitoring of safety signals.

Action needed

MAHs must ensure draft protocols are placed correctly in the CTD and that submission planning considers the clarified assessment timelines, with RMP updates contingent upon PRAC endorsement.

Relevant for
Regulatory Intelligence LeadQPPV
Processes impacted
Country Compliance
Owner

Regulatory Intelligence Lead

Review cadence

Review in the next regulatory intelligence cycle.

Policy change details

Document type
Q&A
Policy status
revised
Publication date
2026-07-13
Policy change
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) updated its Questions and Answers on Post-authorisation safety studies (PASS), specifically addressing the assessment timelines and submission requirements for non-interventional imposed PASS.

Key changes

Updated Question 11 clarifies that the assessment of a non-interventional imposed PASS final study report by the PRAC takes up to 74 days, followed by 67 days for the European Commission decision-making process. Updated Question 12 specifies that draft protocols for these studies should be submitted in Module 1.8.2 of the CTD and only included in the RMP once endorsed by the PRAC.

Affected workflows

Country Compliance

Responsible groups

Pharmacovigilance OperationsRegulatory Affairs

PV impact

MAHs must align their submission planning for non-interventional imposed PASS with the clarified assessment timelines. Draft protocols must be correctly placed in the CTD (Module 1.8.2) and RMP updates should only occur after PRAC endorsement.

View regulator source

Source document details

Exact policy details

Effective date of Revision 2
9 August 2016
Applies to: Applicable to submission of information on non-interventional post-authorisation safety studies (PASS)
Date for coming into effect of Revision 2: 9 August 2016. · p. 1 · High · Source
Submission of final study report
12 months after end of data collection
Applies to: Final study report for non-interventional PASS conducted under obligation
The final study report shall be submitted within 12 months after the end of data collection. · p. 2 · High · Source
Submission of study protocol and progress reports
As required by national competent authorities
Applies to: All non-interventional PASS conducted voluntarily
The national competent authority may require submission of the study protocol and the progress reports. · p. 2 · High · Source
Study registration in the EU PAS Register
Before study commences or at earliest possible date
Applies to: Non-interventional PASS
Non-interventional PASS should be registered before the study commences or at the earliest possible date. · p. 2 · High · Source

Workflow rule impacts

Country ComplianceMarketing Authorisation Holders

Need for marketing authorisation holders to adapt to updated submission timelines and protocols

Change in submission requirements for PASS

The submission of the final study report within 12 months after data collection affects the compliance requirements. · p. 2 · High · Source

Evidence and confidence

Confidence: highSource updated: Jul 13, 2026

Full briefing

Practical implication

MAHs must ensure draft protocols are placed correctly in the CTD and that submission planning considers the clarified assessment timelines, with RMP updates contingent upon PRAC endorsement.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has updated its guidance for marketing authorisation holders (MAHs) regarding non-interventional imposed post-authorisation safety studies (PASS). New assessment timelines for clinical protocol submissions include a maximum of 74 days for PRAC review, followed by 67 days for European Commission decision-making. Draft protocols must now be submitted in Module 1.8.2 of the Common Technical Document (CTD), and updates to risk management plans (RMP) should occur only after PRAC endorsement.

What changed: EMA established that draft protocols for non-interventional imposed PASS should now be submitted in Module 1.8.2 and aligned submission timelines for assessments are defined as 74 days for PRAC review and 67 days for EC decision.

Why it matters: MAHs need to adjust their planning and submission processes to comply with these updated timelines and requirements, which could significantly impact the speed of study implementation and monitoring of safety signals.

Practical implication: MAHs must ensure draft protocols are placed correctly in the CTD and that submission planning considers the clarified assessment timelines, with RMP updates contingent upon PRAC endorsement.

View original source

Published from the Firecrawl policy change extraction pipeline.

Related updates for your role

publicNational Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency (NPRA), Malaysia · Malaysia · Updated Aug 25, 2026

List of Cosmetic Manufacturers in QUEST System in Malaysia

Urgency: High

Review and verify that any cosmetic products sourced or distributed comply with the manufacturers listed in the updated QUEST system.

Country ComplianceRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact1 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead
verifiedRegulatory action: Regulators
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA) · European Union · Updated Aug 24, 2026

Chenodeoxycholic Acid Leadiant Labeling Update

Urgency: High

Annual reviews of new information will be conducted to update the summary, requiring continuous monitoring and data submission in response to findings.

Signal ManagementRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact1 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead
verifiedRegulatory action: Latest
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicEuropean Medicines Agency · European Union · Updated Aug 26, 2026

QRD Guidance on Abbreviations and Pictograms for Veterinary Medicines

Urgency: High

Marketing authorization holders (MAHs) must review and potentially update their product labeling to align with the new regulations by 11 April 2029 for products authorized before 11 May 2024.

Signal ManagementRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact1 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead
verifiedRegulatory action: Regulators
Read impact briefarrow_forward
publicTGA · Australia · Updated Aug 25, 2026

Additional Public Consultation on Amending the Poisons Standard regarding Ethylene Oxide, Propylene Oxide, and Epichlorohydrin

Monitoring

Regulatory Intelligence leads should initiate monitoring of feedback and prepare for potential regulatory adjustments related to the specified substances.

Country ComplianceRegulatory Intelligence Lead
SOP Impact1 SOPs
ConfidenceHigh
Relevant for: Regulatory Intelligence Lead
verifiedRegulatory action: Regulators
Read impact briefarrow_forward